The 2003 Hall of Fame Veterans Committee
Vote
In August 2001, the National Baseball Hall of Fame overhauled the
Veterans Committee and its voting procedures. Of particular
interest to this Committee are the changes affecting the ballot
for managers, umpires and executives. As the players' ballot
has been argued to death elsewhere, this article will concentrate
on the non-players in general, and the owners/executives in
particular.
The former 15-member Veterans Committee met once a year. Only
those attending the meeting were eligible to vote, and vote
totals were never released. The new system expanded the Veterans
Committee to include all living Hall of Famers; all living
recipients of the Ford C. Frick Award (broadcasters); all living
recipients of the J.G. Taylor Spink Award (writers); and two
members of the former Veterans Committee whose terms would not
expire before 2003, Ken Coleman and John McHale. The new
Committee, which for 2003 contained 85 eligible voters, would
cast two separate ballots by mail: one for up to 10 of the 26
players ultimately selected for the Players Ballot, the other for
up to 10 of the 15 managers, umpires and executives chosen for
the Composite Ballot.
To qualify for the Composite Ballot, a nominee had to have been
retired from baseball for five years. This waiting period was
reduced to six months for candidates over 65. The rules expressly
provided that those who both played and served as a manager or
executive would appear on only one of the two ballots, but should
be judged by their total contribution, and that "voting
shall be based upon the individual's record, ability,
integrity, sportsmanship, character and contribution to the
game."
The process of creating the ballot began with a 10-member
Historical Overview Committee appointed by the Baseball
Writers' Association of America's Board of Directors. The
Committee (Bob Elliott, Steve Hirdt, Rick Hummel, Moss Klein,
Bill Madden, Ken Nigro, Jack O'Connell, Nick Peters, Tracy
Ringolsby and Dave Van Dyck) took the first cut at reducing the
pool of eligible candidates, compiling lists of 200 players and
60 non-players potentially worthy of consideration.
The original list of 60 managers, umpires and executives
included 17 managers or coaches (Roger Craig, Charlie Dressen,
Fred Haney, Whitey Herzog, Ralph Houk, Fred Hutchinson, Billy
Martin, Gene Mauch, Danny Murtaugh, Steve O'Neill, Paul
Richards, Billy Southworth, George Stallings, Chuck Tanner,
Birdie Tebbetts, Patsy Tebeau and Dick Williams); 10 umpires
(Bill Dinneen, Larry Goetz, Doug Harvey, Hank O'Day, Steve
Palermo, Babe Pinelli, Beans Reardon, Cy Rigler, Bill Summers and
Lee Weyer) and 33 executives.
The 33 executives can be further subdivided into 17 who were
primarily owners or owner/GMs (Gene Autry, Sam Breadon, Charles
Bronfman, Gussie Busch, George W. Bush, Barney Dreyfuss, John
Fetzer, Charles O. Finley, John Galbreath, Calvin Griffith, Ewing
Kauffman, Walter O'Malley, Joan Payson, Alfred Reach, Ben
Shibe, Charles Somers, Chris Von Der Ahe and Phil Wrigley); nine
who were primarily GMs (Buzzie Bavasi, Harry Dalton, Bob Howsam,
Frank Lane, Paul Owens, Gabe Paul, John A.R. (Robert) Quinn, Bill
Rigney and Cedric Tallis); five who were primarily major league
officials (Chub Feeney, Garry Herrmann, John Heydler, Bowie Kuhn
and Bill White), and one who was a labor leader (Marvin
Miller).
On balance, the list of 60 looks solid. The candidates presented
by the Historical Overview Committee span more than a century of
Major League Baseball, from the 1880s through the 1990s. Although
it would be easy to trim a dozen names from this roster, the only
real clinker is George W. Bush, whose nine years as an owner of
the Texas Rangers hardly qualify him for induction. Indeed, under
the Hall of Fame's rules Bush shouldn't even have been
considered: Bush didn't officially sell the Rangers until
June 1998, less than five years before the election.
A BBWAA Screening Committee consisting of two writers from each
major league city (four from two-club cities) then pared the
original list of 60 down to a final 15. These included four
managers (Herzog, Martin, Richards and Williams); four owners
(Busch, Finley, O'Malley and Wrigley); three general managers
(Bavasi, Dalton and Paul); two league officials (Kuhn and White);
one umpire (Harvey) and one labor leader (Miller).
At this stage of the process, unfortunately, the Screening
Committee functioned much like the old Veterans Committee, with a
marked bias toward the writers' contemporaries. All of the
fifteen finalists were active in 1976 or thereafter. It's
difficult, verging on the impossible, to come up with any other
explanation for preferring Phil Wrigley or Harry Dalton to Barney
Dreyfuss or Garry Herrmann -- and if the beer money Gussie Busch
brought to MLB was a factor in his nomination, what about Charles
Somers, who bankrolled half the American League in 1901?
The fifteen names on the final list were then submitted to the
85-member electorate. With 79 of the 85 voting on the composite
ballot, 60 votes were needed to elect any candidate. None of the
fifteen received the necessary votes. Indeed, none came close,
with only umpire Doug Harvey winning even a majority. Marvin
Miller failed to become the first recipient of this newsletter
elected to the Hall of Fame, while Buzzie Bavasi did become the
first person known to have received votes for the Hall of Fame
while a dues-paying member of SABR.
The totals:
- Doug Harvey: 48 votes
- Walter O'Malley: 38 votes
- Marvin Miller: 35 votes
- Buzzie Bavasi: 34 votes
- Dick Williams: 33 votes
- Whitey Herzog: 25 votes
- Billy Martin: 22 votes
- Bill White: 22 votes
- Bowie Kuhn: 20 votes
- Gabe Paul: 13 votes
- Gussie Busch: 11 votes
- Paul Richards: 10 votes
- Charles O. Finley: 9 votes
- Phil Wrigley: 9 votes
- Harry Dalton: 6 votes.
Doug Harvey was a deserving candidate. Anyone who umpired for
more than 30 years, earning so much respect that the players
nicknamed him "God," has my vote. So does Walter
O'Malley, clearly the strongest of the owner nominees. How
could the old Veterans Committee have inducted Tom Yawkey but not
O'Malley? And how could Marvin Miller receive fewer than half
the votes -- even being left off the ballots cast by a number of
modern Hall of Famers who owe their entire standard of living to
Miller? (Meanwhile, Miller's nemesis Bowie Kuhn received 20
votes. Voting for Kuhn but not Miller is like voting for the
Washington Generals but not the Harlem Globetrotters.)
After just one election, it is already clear that the structure
of the Composite Ballot must be overhauled. Although the Players
Ballot similarly failed to produce an inductee, there is a
fundamental difference between the two ballots. All of the
candidates on the Players Ballot have already been reviewed and
rejected by the regular BBWAA electorate, but for candidates on
the Composite Ballot, the Veterans Committee is their only chance
for induction. The current Veterans Committee is unlikely ever to
elect a candidate from the Composite Ballot. Marvin Miller
probably stands the best chance, but not until the players,
writers and broadcasters whose careers predate free agency leave
the electorate. Since members of the current Veterans Committee
serve for life, that may not happen until about 2020...the year
Miller will turn 103.
The Composite Ballot also suffers from a lack of historical
perspective. Although the Historical Overview Committee did a
fine job of presenting a field of candidates, the writers on the
Screening Committee devalued all contributions occurring before
their own era -- and even if they hadn't, the electorate as
currently constituted will never muster a three-fourths majority
for any pre-1970 candidate. Fixing this would require two
significant changes.
First, the two-stage process of creating a ballot should be
reduced to one. Let the Historical Overview Committee prepare a
ballot with 25 or 30 names, to be presented directly to the
voters with no winnowing from a Screening Committee. Second,
limit the Composite Ballot to voters willing to study the
qualifications of the candidates -- and to put them in the
context of the Hall of Fame as it currently exists. That
doesn't mean lowering the standard to that of the worst
inductees, but neither does it mean allowing current Hall of
Famers to impose an artificially high standard on those deemed
worthy of joining them.
Since 1960 the Hall of Fame has inducted eleven "pioneers
or executives": Branch Rickey (1967), Ford Frick (1970),
George Weiss (1971), Will Harridge (1972), Larry MacPhail (1978),
Warren Giles (1979), Tom Yawkey (1980), Happy Chandler (1982),
Bill Veeck (1991), William Hulbert (1995) and Lee MacPhail
(1978). Hulbert's induction was the long-overdue correction
of a mistake made in 1937, when the Hall erroneously credited
Morgan Bulkeley with founding the National League. Rickey, Weiss,
Larry MacPhail, Chandler and Veeck were inducted primarily for
their accomplishments, while for Frick, Harridge, Giles, Yawkey
and Lee MacPhail, election to the Hall of Fame was baseball's
version of a super-gold watch presented for long and meritorious
service.
Among the leading votegetters, Marvin Miller is in Branch
Rickey's class as a nominee: if he's not in, something is
seriously wrong with the category, the electorate or both. Walter
O'Malley's not far behind. Depending how much credit for
the Dodgers' success one gives to O'Malley, Buzzie Bavasi
is either George Weiss or, at worst, on a level with Giles and
Lee MacPhail. As MLB's first African-American league
president, Bill White earns symbolic points, but like Happy
Chandler, his candidacy for the Hall ultimately hinges on the
value one places on symbolism. Bowie Kuhn and Ford Frick are
quite comparable -- Kuhn served longer as Commissioner, but
without Frick's prior years as a league president. And
although he languished toward the bottom of the ballot, Charles
O. Finley has much more in common with Bill Veeck than many of
Veeck's admirers would care to admit.
Reggie Jackson recently told Bill Madden of the New York
Daily News, "I just feel the Hall of Fame itself should
be for only players. The executives, managers, umpires and the
others should be separate." That's not Reggie's
decision to make, any more than an MVP voter should be free to
disregard the explicit directive that pitchers are eligible for
the award. A properly redesigned Veterans Committee would require
its electorate -- whether players, writers, broadcasters,
executives or some combination thereof -- to study the historical
record before voting, and would provide that electorate with a
ballot designed to present the best possible cross-section of
nominees from all eras of baseball history.
Copyright © 2003 Doug Pappas. All rights
reserved.
Originally published in the Winter 2003 issue of Outside the
Lines, the SABR Business of
Baseball Committee newsletter.
Back to Doug's Outside the
Lines feature index
Back
to Doug's Business of Baseball menu
To
roadsidephotos.sabr.org home page