Lessons from the Strike of 1981
Baseball is the most historically-minded sport, and the
“Today in Baseball History” column is a common
fine-print feature. But there won’t be any “20 years
ago today” entries this month: July 1981 was the Month
Without Baseball.
Before the 1994-95 meltdown, the 50-day labor stoppage that split
the 1981 season marked the lowest point in modern baseball
history. It offers several lessons for the current labor
situation.
Lesson One: The sky is NOT falling. In January 1981,
Whitey Herzog warned, "Before long, you can look for some
teams to go bankrupt, like the Minnesota Twins. The Twins and
some other clubs just can't afford to compete for salaries
the way things are set up. I think the bankruptcies will start in
two or three years." Instead of going bankrupt, the Twins
won two World Series in 10 years.
Sound familiar? At press time, those same Twins would knock the
Yankees out of the playoffs -- thanks largely to a trade, widely
described as a salary dump, that brought them Eric Milton and
Cristian Guzman for Chuck Knoblauch.
Lesson Two: Ignore what the owners say; look at what they
do. Before the 1981 season, MLB spent $2 million on a
strike-insurance policy. The policy contained a 153-game
deductible, after which the owners would receive $100,000 for
each of the next 500 games lost to a labor dispute. After taking
a hard line for months, the owners yielded on the central issue
just as the strike insurance ran out.
Coincidence? I’ll believe Bud Selig’s talk of
contraction just as soon as I see him write a $10-$15 million
check to the owners losing their teams.
Lesson Three: The owners don’t really understand their
own business. After having free agency rammed down their
throats before the 1976 labor talks, the owners vowed to limit
its effect. The owners and players resolved every other issue in
1980; the one and only issue in the 1981 talks was the
owners’ insistence that teams losing a free agent should be
compensated with a player off the signing club’s major
league roster.
Under their original proposal, free agent signings would have
become, in effect, forced trades. A club losing any free
agent could draft a player from the signing club. Since the
signing club would be allowed to protect only 15 players from its
roster, the price of signing a free agent would probably include
the loss of the club’s best reserve, fifth starter, or #2
setup man.
It would be hard to design a compensation formula less suited for
achieving its intended purpose. The owners’ formula would
have had no effect on the competition for the elite free agents
whose salaries drove the market: the Red Sox’ pursuit of
Manny Ramirez would hardly have been deterred by the prospect of
losing Mike Lansing or Rod Beck in return. But it would have
destroyed the free agent market for the less skilled veterans who
dominate every roster. The owners couldn’t understand why
these players led the opposition to their proposal.
Lesson Four: Whatever solution is ultimately reached, the
owners will find a way to screw it up. The 1981 strike ended
with a compensation formula along the lines proposed by the
players. Teams losing free agents ranked among the top 20% at
their position – “Type A” free agents –
would be entitled to a compensation pick -- but that player could
be drafted from the roster of any team eligible to sign free
agents. Clubs signing a Type A free agent could protect 24
players in their entire organization. Everyone else could protect
26, except for five teams (including the Red Sox) who opted out
of the free agent market for three years. Those five
couldn’t sign anyone else’s free agents, but in
return were exempted from the draft.
This unwieldy system worked fine for two years. But the 1983-84
offseason brought two self-inflicted public relations
embarrassments which ultimately brought down the system.
First the White Sox, who lost Dennis Lamp to the Blue Jays after
posting the majors’ best record in 1983, drafted Tom Seaver
from the last-place New York Mets. Even Commissioner Kuhn
admitted that he had asked the White Sox not to draft Seaver.
Because every player in the organization was subject to the draft
unless protected, the Mets had shielded 12 minor leaguers ahead
of Seaver, including future All-Stars Dwight Gooden, Kevin
Mitchell, Sid Fernandez and Len Dykstra.
Then the Yankees lost a player they hadn’t even been able
to protect. Oakland drafted Tim Belcher from the Yankees even
though Belcher, the nation’s top amateur pitching prospect,
hadn’t signed with the Yankees until three days after the
deadline for submitting protected lists. Adding insult to injury,
the draft price paid by Oakland was a fraction of the bonus the
Yankees had given Belcher.
After forcing a 50-day strike to win the compensation draft, the
owners quietly abolished it in the next labor agreement. Only
time will tell if the owners will again fight a battle
that’s not worth winning...but if history is any guide,
they probably will.
Copyright © 2001 Doug Pappas. All rights
reserved.
Originally published in the July 2001 issue of Boston
Baseball.
Back to Doug's Boston Baseball
column index
Back
to Doug's Business of Baseball menu
To
roadsidephotos.sabr.org main menu